How Ethics and Morals Bring Clarity to a Chaotic World

The terms “ethics” and “morals” are often used interchangeably, but there are important differences between the two. Ethics require a group consensus of some form, whether formal or informal, whereas morals is for the individual to decide. Of course, one impacts the other, with a sort of chicken-and-egg effect, and both have an enormous impact on how we approach difficult subjects and navigate complex problems. TEDMED 2018 Speakers Adam Waytz, Rabiaa El Garani, Sherry Johnson, and Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin are each tackling moral and ethical dilemmas and sharing their wisdom from the Stage this November. Whether through research or lived experience, these Speakers will share stories of exploring, grappling with, and resolving health-related moral and ethical dilemmas on both individual and societal levels.

Adam Waytz, a psychologist and associate professor at Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management, is interested in uncovering what motivates a whistle-blower, or a person who decides to come forward to report someone else’s unethical behavior. Adam and his colleagues have conducted research to discover the psychological determinants of whistle-blowing in order to shed light on the factors that either encourage or discourage a potential whistle-blower to come forward. Their findings revealed that there are two basic moral values at odds when someone decides whether or not they will speak out about an offense: fairness and loyalty. People who prioritize fairness over loyalty tend to show a greater willingness to be a whistleblower, while those who prioritize loyalty show more hesitation to speak out. Through his work, Adam is lending new insight into how the guiding principles of ethics and morals can vary so much from person to person and contribute to drastically different decisions.

There are some issues around which morality and ethics are seemingly clear-cut. For instance, Sexual and Gender Based Violence (SGBV) is widely recognized as a serious crime and human rights violation. Unfortunately, SGBV is still a common occurrence in far too many places in the world. As an international investigator of SGBV and a member of the Justice Rapid Response-UN Women SGBV Justice Experts Roster, Rabiaa El Garani has traveled to places that are experiencing deep moral and ethical conflict surrounding SGBV—including Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, and the Central African Republic. In the JRR-UN Women documentary Evidence of Hope, a survivor who shared her traumatic experiences with Rabiaa underscored the importance of Rabiaa’s SGBV investigative work, saying “After I met [her] I realized that there are some people in the world that care about us.” Rabiaa’s work is bringing justice to survivors of SGBV, voicing their stories, and laying the groundwork for a new code of ethics in parts of the world where SGBV is often ignored or even accepted. 

While SGBV is considered a crime in every state across America, many people would be surprised to learn that child marriage is not. Sherry Johnson is a survivor of child marriage who was forced to marry her rapist at age 11, and by age 27, she was a mother of 9. Today, Sherry advocates for the fair treatment of children and fights for the abolishment of child marriage in the United States. After spending the past several years lobbying the Florida legislature on the issue of child marriage, Sherry recently achieved a major victory with the signing of SB 140 into law, which restricts marriage in the state to those who are at least 17 years old. However, the fight is far from over—almost all states still have some legal variation for children to marry.  

Another ethical debate that concerns America’s young people surrounds the practice of vaping, which is the inhaling and exhaling of aerosol (also referred to as vapor) through an e-cigarette or similar device. Vaping and e-cigarettes were initially considered to be a less harmful alternative to smoking tobacco cigarettes, however recent studies have shown their effects to be much more deleterious than originally thought. Furthermore, with advertising that appears to target youth, candy-like flavors like mango and fruit medley, and devices that pack an alarmingly high nicotine content, the vaping industry has become the subject of extensive ethical scrutiny in recent years. Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin is a biobehavioral scientist and a professor of psychiatry at the Yale University School of Medicine whose research focuses on the bio-behavioral understanding of vaping and substance use behaviors in young people. By digging deeper into teen vaping behavior, Suchitra is uncovering important information that can be used by policymakers as they look to regulate the e-cigarette industry in an effort to help keep children away from the highly addictive and harmful habit.

From health and wellbeing to human rights and policy, we look to ethics and morals to help bring clarity to our often chaotic world. Although the lines between right and wrong may seem clear to many, such as in the cases of child marriage, SGBV, and teen vaping, the fact is, these are not universal truths. Furthermore, given the individualized psychology behind how we establish our morals, we may never be able to see eye to eye on some things. We’re excited to continue exploring the complexities of ethics, morality, science, and behavior from the Stage this year and to gain a deeper understanding of these concepts from TEDMED 2018 Speakers Adam, Rabiaa, Sherry, and Suchitra. We hope to see you there!

The Creative Potential of Data

When you think of the word “data,” what’s the first thing that comes to mind? Maybe statistics, graphs, or evidence? How about creativity? Probably not. In fact, many people think of creativity and data as polar opposites. However, what if that wasn’t necessarily the case? Just think about it: analyzing data requires imagination, finding hidden patterns, and translating information into relatable and digestible stories. Today’s Speaker Spotlight focuses on three TEDMED 2018 Speakers who are approaching data creatively and translating their findings to yield new insights in their areas of expertise. Whether it’s hacking the human genome, revealing how data informs behavior, or creating art from MRIs, these Speakers are telling fascinating stories through data in unique and exciting ways.

Data privacy is a hot topic today, but discussions of the issue are rarely focused on the importance of protecting our genetic data. However, genealogy expert Yaniv Erlich and his team made a shocking discovery when they found a privacy loophole that enabled the re-identification of allegedly anonymous male research participants using just internet searches and their Y chromosome. Dubbed the “Genome Hacker” by Nature, Yaniv’s work has pushed the science community to think about genealogy privacy from different angles and to find new ways to utilize our genetic data to inspire positive scientific progress. Yaniv is also responsible for assembling the world’s largest crowdsourced family tree, which includes information from 13 million people, as well as developing the website DNA.land, which has gathered the genotypes of over 100,000 individual donors. With this complex layering of data, Yaniv is paving a path toward establishing a digitized genetic connection between every human alive.

Yaniv Erlich- Whitehead Institute from PMWC Intl on Vimeo.

In today’s digital world, health data isn’t being used exclusively by doctors and scientists. There are apps, devices, and home tests that enable the anyone to collect, monitor, and track their personal health data. David Asch, a behavioral economist at the University of Pennsylvania, warns that we should not look to these “quantified self” datasets as primary drivers of health behavior change, but instead we should view them as promising facilitators. In a 2015 JAMA piece, Asch and his co-authors noted that while wearable health tracking devices “are increasing in popularity, little evidence suggests that they are bridging that gap” between simply “recording and reporting information about behaviors such as physical activity or sleep patterns” and actually “educat[ing] and motivat[ing] individuals toward better habits and better health.” By diving deeper into the realities of quantified self data outcomes, David is working to move past the hype and to communicate what is most effective in inspiring positive health changes.

Of course, gaining insight into our health often requires more intensive measures than self-tracking, and many people undergo diagnostic tests such as CT scans or MRIs to see what’s going on inside of their body. While many people find getting one of these tests to be an unsettling experience, artist Marilène Oliver finds beauty and opportunity in diagnostic scans. Inspired by Hans Moravec’s idea that the Digital Age could one day enable us to download our consciousness, Marilène took the concept one step further and asked, “what about our bodies?” Finding that this question couldn’t be answered solely in virtual sculptures or fully physical structures, Marilène now creates work that strives to bring digitized bodies to life. Marilène’s art not only spotlights new and explosive ways to interpret our medical data, but it also helps us to more deeply explore questions surrounding our health, wellbeing, and physical body.

Marilene Oliver. Portfolio of Selected Work 2003-2013 from Marilene Oliver on Vimeo.

Data collection and interpretation has become a dynamic and creative process. With the power of a search engine, a smartwatch, or a PET scan, we are now able to glean insights into health and medicine that were previously unimaginable. For Yaniv, David, and Marilène, data has been the fuel that helped them to establish important new connections and to reconsider how they think about health. By unleashing the creativity and possibility inherent in data, these three speakers are inspiring us to look at information in new ways and to answer the question: how will you think about data?

Policy @ Home: How are you going to change America’s health for the better?

Often when we think about public policy, we think about lawmakers. After all, they are the ones who can make the change. However, we have found time and time again that changing public health policy is not limited to those serving in government offices. For researchers, medical practitioners, and community members, what it takes to be a change maker is finding your answer to the question, “How are you going to change America’s health for the better?” Each of our Speaker’s in this week’s Speaker Spotlight have found unique answers to how they are impacting change in America and helping to build a healthier future. Whether it’s from the Senate Chambers or a research lab, each of these Speakers will share their vision for how public policy can create a healthier United States.

As the 20th Surgeon General of the United States, Vice Admiral Jerome Adams is faced with a monumental task: improving the health of the American people. Specifically, Dr. Adams is responsible for overseeing the operations of the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps and providing the public with the best scientific information available regarding how they can better their health and reduce their risk of injury and illness. Since he took office in 2017, Dr. Adams has had to confront major national public health issues ranging from opioids to hurricane relief effort to health and national security s, which he has approached from a science-first perspective. Additionally, Dr. Adams is focused on demonstrating the connection between health and economic prosperity at the individual, organizational, and community level. Dr. Adams believes in the power of forming non-traditional partnerships, such as with law enforcement and private businesses, to address America’s most difficult health challenges and build healthier communities.

Dr. Adams at the NIH

Affordable and accessible health care is an important piece of the policy puzzle, too. Irene Papanicolas is a health system performance analyst who asks the important question “Why is health care spending in the United States so much greater than in other high-income countries?” While many have asked that question before, Irene has examined the data behind several theories, finding that issues with the prices of labor and goods, as well as high administrative costs are the main drivers of the differences in spending. Her research, which digs deeper into the strengths, weaknesses, and intricacies of different health care systems around the globe, is providing policymakers with critical data and inspiring new ways of thinking about the future of the US healthcare system.

Sometimes, the most effective policies are already on the books. April Zeoli, an associate professor in the School of Criminal Justice at Michigan State University, has conducted extensive research on the association between laws addressing intimate partner violence (IPV), gun violence, and intimate partner homicide (IPH) rates. With her work, April digs into important questions such as what are “the risks of firearm access and use in IPV?” as well as what is the “effectiveness of interventions designed specifically to reduce firearm violence in intimate relationships”? Importantly, April has found that some states have policies that have proven to reduce instances of IPV and IPH — which have the potential to be adopted in other states as well.

Denisse Rojas’s work also has the potential to change policies in a major way. Denisse grew up as an undocumented immigrant and saw firsthand the issues that marginalized populations in the United States face when it comes to health care — experiences that have inspired Denisse to pursue a career in both medicine and public policy. In addition to her commitment to influencing immigration and health policy, Denisse is dedicated to helping other aspiring medical students navigate the DACA program through the organization she co-founded, Pre-Health Dreamers. With her educational fate in the hands of the government, Denisse is currently pursuing a Masters in Public Policy at Harvard Kennedy School in the hopes of influencing immigration policy, and its health impacts on undocumented people, for the better.

Denisse testifying to the Senate Judiciary Committee, October 2017

Whether it be research, advocacy, partnerships, or law, there are many ways to answer the question, “How are you going to change the health of Americans for the better?” Dr. Adams, Irene, April, and Denisse have all chosen different paths to address public health concerns in the US. Progress does not come without struggle, which each of these Speakers shed light on the incredible challenges we face as a nation, as well as individuals. However, their stories and research spark hope that there are clear ways to change policy to pave the way to a healthier future.

Q&A with Sian Leah Beilock, Performance Under Pressure Sage

Sian Leah Beilock is exploring the science behind why people “choke” in pressure-packed situations. Specifically, she examines factors in the brain and body that influence performance in stressful situations ranging from test taking, to public speaking, to sporting events. Using a variety of research methods, including assessing test performance to neuroimaging techniques, Sian’s work is aimed at better understanding how our cognition and reasoning skills change when we are under stress. Sian’s research is routinely covered in the media, including CNN, NPR, The New York Times, and The Wall Street Journal. In 2017, the National Academy of Sciences honored Sian with the Troland Award, in recognition of her pioneering work in experimental psychology. Sian has published two books and over 100 papers though her research. After serving as Executive Vice Provost of the University of Chicago, Sian was recently appointed as the eighth President of Barnard College. She spoke at TEDMED 2017, and you can watch her Talk here.


TEDMED: You were an athlete growing up, and in your talk you speak a lot about the pressures that athletes feel when it’s game time. How do you see athletic performance relating to the other types of performance pressures that people feel, such as those in the classroom or in the boardroom? Is there anything interesting to note in how these pressures are alike and how they’re different?

Sian Leah Beilock: I did spend a lot of time on the soccer field during my youth, and I learned, often the hard way, how the mental and the physical are linked. Later, as a scientist, I’ve studied this connection closely. Dealing with pressure is a universal. It doesn’t change, whether you have a golf club in your hand or a pencil. It’s the same. Accomplished athletes learn how to thrive when all eyes are on them—and by observing how they manage that and the strategies they use, we can learn a lot about how students survive the pressure of tests and how we can cope with other pressures of everyday life.

TM: In your Talk, you share how overthinking performance and trying to control the situation causes many people to flub under pressure. However, many people at the top of their fields are often considered to be “Type A” or even “control freaks.” It would seem that these people would suffer from what you call “paralysis by analysis,” and yet many seem to be thriving. How do you explain this seeming contradiction?

SLB: There is a time to focus on the details and a time to, as Nike regularly reminds us, “just do it.” When you are practicing and learning your craft, of course you have to pay close attention to the step-by-step process—that can be very important, even critical. But, my guess is, in the moment, when even the most Type A leaders excel, they are trusting their instincts and focusing on the outcome rather than the process. They are always keeping the big picture in mind.

TM: From practicing under the conditions you’ll be performing under to taking the time to write down all the worries and self-doubts circling around in your mind, your TEDMED Talk gave us some valuable strategies to employ when we’re looking to perform our best under pressure. We have a feeling that you have many more good tips, would you mind sharing a few more?

SLB: Well, here’s one tip that I try to use myself. Think about why you should succeed—rather than entertain the reasons why you might fail. I also recommend reinterpreting the signs that your body is giving you. Rather than your sweaty palms and increased heart beat being signs that you are freaking out, remind yourself that these physiological reactions are important and useful. They are shunting resources to your brain and body so that you can think and perform at your best.

TM: What was the TEDMED experience like for you? It would be especially interesting to learn more about how you prepared for the pressure of memorizing and presenting your Talk!

SLB: Believe me, I feel pressure like everyone else (maybe even more powerfully since that’s the crux of my research), but I also try to practice what I preach. Practicing— not just by yourself, but under the same conditions you are going to encounter when you perform—is what matters. It gets you used to what you are going to experience in the big moment. I talk about it as closing the gap between training and competition. I did this to prep for my TEDMED talk and it helped. I practiced on my own, but also in front of others—people I trust and whose opinions I value. I promise you it was nerve wracking every time, but it made the big day a little less daunting.

Growing up Healthy

Adolescence is a shared human experience full of transitions, experimentation, and growth. It is a rite of passage defined in many ways, whether through religious rituals or legal rights, at one of the most critical developmental stages in a person’s life. In society’s best effort to raise healthy kids, we’ve attempted to place structure around the process of “growing up”—we try to standardize the goals we set, achievements we reach, and skills we acquire. However, as adults continue to more closely and carefully usher adolescents into adulthood, we have to wonder: have we over-defined expectations? Are we interfering too much with the ultimate, shared experience of adolescence—learning how to shape your own identity?

Among the Speakers taking the Stage at TEDMED this November are four experts who have studied various facets of adolescence and how the expectations that today’s youth face—whether self-imposed, parental, peer, or cultural—can impact their mental health and their ability to adjust into healthy adults.

In 2017, the World Health Organization reported that young people around the world are suffering from serious depression and anxiety disorders at record rates—and the growth trend doesn’t appear to be slowing down. Thomas Curran, of the University of Bath’s Department for Health, has been studying the rise of perfectionism and how it might be contributing to these near-epidemic levels of serious mental illness among young people. In a longitudinal study, Thomas found an alarming increase in all dimensions of perfectionism among young people. He found that “socially prescribed perfectionism,” the area of perfectionism associated with excessively high social expectations and the dimension with the largest correlation to a variety of mental health issues, is growing at twice the rate of other dimensions. With his work, Thomas hopes to shed light on the burden of perfectionism and how we can help lessen the stresses felt by young people today.

Niobe Way, Professor of Developmental Psychology and the founder of the Project for the Advancement of Our Common Humanity at New York University, also studies the social pressures that many young people face and how it affects them. Niobe is particularly focused on young men and the detrimental impact of expecting boys to be less emotional and caring than their female counterparts. Through her research, Niobe found that stereotypically feminine traits, such as emotional openness, are necessary for boys’ health and well-being, and that we all share the very human desires for emotional intimacy and connection. Furthermore, her first-hand experience as a counselor at an urban public high school reinforced the importance of the need for connection among boys. As a counselor, Niobe saw the positive impact of listening to boys talk about their deeper feelings on friendships and relationships. This experience drove her to begin the research she continues today and to advocate for how to best support the development of healthy young men.

For youth developing and exploring their gender identity, there are many difficult questions to answer. Unfortunately, society often forces young people to live in a binary male/female world where not everyone feels that they belong. sj Miller’s work centers on how these binary norms can be harmful to a person’s mental health and how in today’s evolving culture, we must work to adopt an inclusive way of defining (a)gender. As a professor and consultant on professional development for teaching, affirming, and recognizing trans*+ and gender creative/expansive students, sj helps to expand how we think about gender, our relationship to our own (a)gender identity, and how we can best support adolescents in accepting their own identity. Using schools as a primary vehicle for creating safe spaces for trans*+ and gender creative/expansive students, sj’s research illuminates a path toward broad social change and a society that is more accepting of all people.

Adolescence is also a time where many people begin to explore their sexuality. And while many adults today are taking an increasingly hands-on approach in guiding their children through the various challenges of adolescence, the topic of sex remains a difficult conversation for many families to have. In the absence of sufficient information on the subject, Emily F. Rothman, a public health scholar and professor at Boston University, has found that youth are turning to pornography to learn about sex. Emily is adamant that if young people are going to watch pornography as an educational tool, then they must be able to watch it as critical thinkers, not passive consumers. Furthermore, Emily argues that it’s important to help teens become pornography literate—capable of analyzing what is healthy and what is not in consensual sexual interaction—so that they can have genuine conversations about their views of sex and pornography. Having written a pornography literacy curriculum that is being implemented in several after school programs in Boston – and soon to be implemented in programs around the country as well – Emily and her team are now working to find the best ways to help young people think critically about sexual interactions, with the intention of reducing the potential for dating violence and abuse in their relationships.

Adolescence is a period of simultaneous Chaos+Clarity, where individuals break down their identity and rebuild it over and over again. While this developmental period is fraught with the challenges inherent in any transition, today’s youth face an especially complicated set of issues and pressures. As we learn more about the work of 2018 TEDMED Speakers Thomas, Niobe, sj, and Emily, we come to see that keeping non-judgemental communications lines open with young people is one of the best ways to support them through this difficult time in their life. After all, adolescence isn’t meant to be perfect. Instead, it should be a time where burgeoning young people are encouraged to ask questions, make mistakes, and learn to deal with life’s struggles in a way that helps to prepare them to become happy, healthy, well-adjusted adults.

In States Considering Medicaid Expansion: Ignore the Myths and Look to the Evidence

Heidi Allen studies the impact of health and social policies on the well-being of low-income families. She was a leading investigator on the landmark Oregon Health Insurance Experiment—the first randomized study in the United States to evaluate the impacts of a Medicaid health insurance expansion on uninsured adults. Currently, Heidi is an Associate Professor in the School of Social Work at Columbia University, where she teaches courses on health policy and advanced policy practice. Heidi spoke at TEDMED 2017, and you can watch her Talk here.


In my TEDMED talk, I shared my personal experience of a family member who was diagnosed with stage IV cancer while uninsured. By the time my sister was diagnosed, the cancer was no longer treatable. I’m a professor at Columbia University who has studied U.S. health policy for the past decade, and even I had no idea how to help Rachel navigate the end of her life without health insurance. She died in a matter of weeks, which left us all stunned and devastated, but also spared her family the financial difficulties and subsequent access barriers that we inevitably would have encountered had she been given treatment options or required hospice.

Heidi and her sister, Rachel

I didn’t share my story because it was unique; I shared it because there are still millions of Americans who love someone who is uninsured or are themselves uninsured. In 2014, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) offered states the opportunity, and significant federal funding, to expand Medicaid to their uninsured poor. Yet many states have chosen not to do that, including Idaho, where my sister lived. The politics around the ACA – or “Obamacare”, as it is often called – are undeniable and complicated, but much of the policy debate still centers on the worthiness of either Medicaid or the uninsured poor. Whether society is obligated to care for the health needs of the uninsured is for many a moral consideration, but research can and should be used to help evaluate the costs and benefits of expanding Medicaid. Some of this research runs contrary to prevalent Medicaid myths that have been shaping the debate.

At TEDMED, I discussed these myths in the context of research findings from one of the most rigorous studies of Medicaid to date, the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment. The unique experimental design of the study allowed us to examine the impacts of Medicaid while ruling out confounding factors burdening many other Medicaid studies. Put simply, we were able to make causal statements about Medicaid outcomes rather than describing associations or having to compare groups that aren’t easily comparable.

One of the most insidious myths out there is that Medicaid does not provide much benefit beyond what is already accessible to the poor through the social safety net. George W. Bush once asserted that everybody in the U.S. has access to health care because emergency departments are required to provide it. There are elements of truth to this argument – indeed, it was in the emergency department where my sister learned she had tumors in her lungs. But emergency departments are there to assess and stabilize patients, not to provide the continuum of needed health care services. To access these health care services, you need health insurance, or a good amount of disposable wealth. The Oregon Experiment found that compared to the uninsured, those who gained Medicaid through a health insurance lottery had improved access to all types of health care (inpatient, outpatient, and prescriptions); rated care they received of higher quality; had better self-reported physical and mental health; and saw improvement in their family finances.

A recent systematic review of the post-ACA research literature reinforces these conclusions about the Medicaid program, particularly related to how Medicaid improves access to care.

Other recent studies have found that Medicaid expansion increases access to benefits for substance-use disorder treatments, which is vital to addressing the current opioid epidemic. And another study found that Medicaid expansion reduced the use of payday loans in California, further supporting the case that Medicaid provides meaningful financial security, not just health security. In sum, the evidence is abundant and trustworthy that for low-income people, having Medicaid provides tangible benefits well beyond those available through the health care safety net.

This November, through ballot initiatives, voters in Idaho and Utah will get to decide the issue of Medicaid expansion for themselves. I hope my TEDMED Talk will contribute to a more meaningful discussion of what Medicaid expansion would mean.

Q&A with Dr. Farida, Aleppo First Responder

Dr. Farida, an OB/GYN, was the last remaining female obstetrician in besieged east Aleppo, Syria. She studied medicine at Aleppo University and worked primarily at the largest trauma facility in East Aleppo, M2, which was supported by the Syrian American Medical Society (SAMS). During the siege she performed procedures under extreme conditions, even completing a cesarean section in the midst of a chemical attack on her hospital. In December, she and her family were displaced from Aleppo and settled in Idlib province, where she currently works in a SAMS hospital. Dr. Farida played an instrumental role in training midwives and nurses in response to the shortage of medical personnel in besieged Aleppo, and has continued this work by designing curriculum’s for new education programs and advocating for international support for nursing and midwife schools. She spoke at TEDMED 2017, and you can watch her Talk here.


TEDMED: In your TEDMED interview with Leila Fadel you gave us a look into your life working as the only female obstetrician in Aleppo during a time of siege. You tried to stay in Aleppo, your hometown, but the regime took control of the city and you were forced to leave. Can you tell us about what life is like today for you and your family and what has changed since we last heard from you?

Dr. Farida: I can summarize this question with one word loneliness—away from my home, dreams, family, and memories.

TM: You spoke about the obligation you feel to stay in Syria and to help as many people as you can. Your bravery and strength are inspiring. What advice do you have for the next generation of doctors in Syria and other war-torn countries?

DF: Please don’t leave poor people alone without medical care, in this way you’ll give the opportunity for deceivers to hurt and cheat innocent people, and that is what is happening now in Syria.

“This photo is of triplets born yesterday in my hospital. They are premature and need a special medication that doesn’t exist in northern Syria. They are so sick and I hope they’ll survive.” — Dr. Farida

TM: What do you think that health workers—especially gynecologists and midwives—from around the world can learn from your story of providing care in Aleppo?

DF: When you are alone in your battle, many people will hurt you, trying to disable your power, you should not care, and instead go on to satisfy your conscience, not the people.

TM: In your interview, you talk about what Aleppo and other areas of war could use from the global community. Has anything improved on this front in the past year? What are the most pressing needs today?

DF: Unfortunately, the medical situation is going worse, the number of doctors is declining day after day, comparable to the increasing number of evicted.

TM: What was the TEDMED experience like for you?

DF: The TEDMED team is so good and hardworking, and I was surprised when I knew the number of the team (just 7)!!! The team members gave me self confidence and made me feel like a superwoman. TEDMED encouraged me to continue my exhausting job in Syria in spite of hopeless and depressive moments.

Q&A with Jennifer Chenoweth, Human Experience Cartographer

Visual artist and entrepreneur Jennifer Chenoweth is the creator of XYZ Atlas, a hedonic map that portrays the feelings, stories and life experiences of people living in and visiting Austin, Texas. By asking people where they had their most significant emotional experiences, she created a topographic map of emotions of a city. Jennifer spoke at TEDMED 2017, and you can watch her talk here.


TEDMED: What is your artistic medium?

Jennifer Chenoweth: I consider my artistic medium to be change. I began using art as a way to change me. Each artwork is record of growth, one marker along a path, indexing a moment in time. Now my art embraces change in my community and world, marking a moment in our collective experience. We experience place through the framework of time. I try to observe change, document change, flow with change, facilitate positive change, recognize loss, and create artworks that give people a way to consider change and to be courageous about change. I think of art as a tool that can change someone’s awareness and expand their perception. I also love learning about new tools and mediums, and new technology allows for so many more choices.

TM: How did your work evolve?

JC: I am interested in the creative process as an investigation into something I am curious about. It is a fascinating time to be alive and to be a life-long learner. My art projects and social engagement are a way of spending time investigating without an expectation of any certain outcome. As an artist, I’m free to pursue the paths that most interest me, which is the privilege of intellectual freedom. I allow participants, or my audience’s questions, to drive the direction of my work. And continue the conversation of learning. Art is the universal language. Sometimes it can be used to better relate and describe change.

TM: How do you decide what art projects you create?

JC: I am inspired by conversations that I have with friends and people I meet. When I was hosting community art events in Austin, I was struck by how devoted people are to their home, and I was very interested in learning about how one comes to have that sense of belonging. In order to have a healthy and whole life, which we are all seeking, feeling a sense of belonging to a place or a community is very high on the list, along with safety, access to healthy foods, and the possibility of meaningful work. So I started asking questions that allowed people to share their stories that create belonging to home. As I set out to evolve myself, I learned that we feel self acceptance through connection with others and working with a purpose. I try to check the motivation for my projects to see if they create connection and help people find purpose.

XYZ Atlas
Photo by Jennifer Ramos

TM: How has your work changed you?

JC: I started out in life low on emotional and physical health. I was driven by my own need to survive, then to discover what a healthy life looks like. Turns out, health is similar for most of us: healthy eating, exercise, safety, a sense of belonging, and doing work that has purpose.

Photo by Jennifer Ramos

Though all of our tools are actively evolving, our need for meaningful lives remain. I love to use art as a tool for connection, and a way to document how we experience belonging.

TM: What was the TEDMED experience like for you?

JC: The TEDMED experience was a dream, and I’m not sure which was the best part. There were so many amazing people to meet, unbelievable wows sitting in the audience and hearing the speakers live, and the deep support I received months in advance as a speaker getting my talk just right. TEDMED The experience totally wowed me, and was the reward I needed at the end of a huge adventure. Plus, of course, the location of the event was gorgeous.

Q&A with Sara Gorman, Motive Detective

Sara Gorman is a public health and behavioral science expert who has written extensively about global health, science communication, psychology, and mental health. Her recent work explores the psychology behind irrational health beliefs and decisions, and also provides advice for how the general public can discriminate between valid and invalid science. Sara is co-founder of Critica, a community committed to making rational decisions about health and security. Sara spoke at TEDMED 2017, and you can watch her Talk here.


TEDMED: Your 2017 TEDMED Talk explores the psychology behind irrational health beliefs and why we stubbornly cling to them, even in the face of conflicting scientific evidence. It’s fascinating work—how did you first get interested in this area of study?

Sara Gorman: I became interested in this area of study after learning about increasingly widespread, unfounded beliefs that routine childhood vaccines were causing autism and other adverse health effects in children. These beliefs had developed largely from a fraudulent study that was retracted by the journal it was published in and yet people were still holding onto the belief upwards of a decade later. I came to understand that, despite what a lot of people thought, these erroneous beliefs had nothing to do with a person’s intelligence or even knowledge of and familiarity with science. Rather, there were strong psychological and social factors that were at play here and this is what I set out to study. As I learned more about these psychological and social factors, I realized that the erroneous belief in a link between vaccines and autism was not the only area in health and medicine in which people were insisting on false ideas despite the evidence. The pattern cropped up in unfounded beliefs that HIV is not the cause of AIDS, in beliefs that keeping a gun in the home makes a person safer, and even in practices by healthcare providers that are not evidence-based.

TM: As you say in your Talk, “Science depends on updating constantly with new information, but our brains do everything they can to keep us from changing our minds.” The best scientists must be willing to be proven wrong—going as far as to purposely seek it out. What can we learn from them?

SG: Scientists are trained to be skeptics and to look for things that will disprove their beliefs. When a study is published, the logical next step is for someone to try to replicate it, and in many cases, failure to replicate can come to show that the original findings may have been a fluke. Scientists know that they must constantly question everything they think is true and even ask themselves why they believe something. They must expose the origins of any belief or tenet and understand whether or not they believe the evidence upon which these assumptions are based. All of us could benefit from approaching most questions in life through this lens. It requires a lot of self-awareness about how we form our beliefs and a lot of questioning and re-assessing once we have formed them. We should re-examine beliefs that were formed a long time ago and make sure they are still valid, just as scientists never take old research for granted but constantly try to evaluate whether it is still valid or whether something has changed.

Of course, one of the most important things I emphasize in my book and in my TEDMED Talk is that scientists are just as prone to errors in judgment and belief as the rest of us, so even they must always continue to work on honing these skills of skepticism and constant re-evaluation of their own beliefs.

TM: In your Talk, you tell a funny story about how you were convinced you hated the ballet—and you were very vocal about your feelings—until your boyfriend (and now husband) wanted to take you there. You walked the audience through the process of how you allowed yourself to change your mind regarding this firmly rooted belief about yourself. Could you walk us through the process of how a person can learn to accept something, such as a new scientific finding or a revelation in the news, that goes against their beliefs?

SG: There is not any one formula that will always work for everyone but there are some general guidelines that people can follow. To begin with, it’s important to understand how you formed the belief in the first place. Ask yourself under what circumstances you came to believe what you believe. Were you very emotional or even very distracted at the time? Sometimes that can color our initial evaluation of the evidence and make us decide that we think something is true even if it’s not. Once you’ve gained a better understanding of how you formed the first belief, try to investigate what the enablers of the belief are for you. Does holding this belief help you connect with an important person in your life or hold on to an important part of your identity? You want to be able to understand what values and motivators outside of the evidence itself might be influencing you to believe something. Then, assess what the barriers to changing your mind might be. Would changing your mind on this topic be likely to isolate you from a group or identity that’s very important to you? Finally, expose yourself to the new idea slowly. Don’t just radically change directions on something and announce your new beliefs to the world overnight. That will be too intimidating. If you decide you want to change your mind about something, try living a few hours or even a day in your new belief. Try it on for size and just see how it feels. Then gradually increase your exposure to the new belief until you feel more comfortable. Over time, it will hopefully become more natural and less scary to change your mind.

TM: What was the TEDMED experience like for you?

SG: It was absolutely exhilarating. I felt like a celebrity. When I was in school, I always did a lot of theater and have really missed the stage ever since. Being on the TEDMED stage reminded me of those experiences, which I remember with fondness and nostalgia. The TEDMED community is also incredibly warm and inviting! I am so lucky to have been included in 2017 and look forward to following TEDMED for many years to come.

More Speakers Announced for TEDMED 2018

This week, we’re delighted to introduce you to more of the inspiring pioneers who will take the TEDMED Stage this fall. Together, we’ll explore how ordinary aspects of everyday life can have large impacts on our health – everything from the animals we live near and the spaces we live in; to the invisible sounds that we hear and the air that we breathe. We’ll rethink socially accepted childhood norms, and expose a controversial practice that impacts children around the world. We’ll also analyze the intersection of two rapidly merging fields: technology and biology. How are we programming synthetic organisms to fight human disease? What can we learn from the DNA of our ancestors and what is the correlation between that data and our health today?

Check out the 8 Speakers below and learn how their work is helping to reveal why ordinary aspects of our everyday lives can have big impacts on our health.

Did you miss last week’s Speaker announcement? See all of the Speakers that we’ve announced so far at TEDMED.com. Next week, we’ll continue sharing the Speakers who will be taking the stage at TEDMED 2018, and we’ll soon reveal this year’s session themes. You won’t want to miss this year’s event—register today!